Offline Casebook Comparison Receipt

01 / Tool workbench

Use the runtime only when it is actually ready.

The application shell fails closed. An input interface is not enabled merely because a WordPress Tool record exists; the declared engine must be registered in the current build.

Offline Casebook Comparison Receipt

BROWSER LOCAL

Checking whether the declared runtime module is loaded. No input has been processed.

Session change summary

No output has been built in this session.

What this Tool does

Compare exact casebook identities and report-document membership between two valid Phase 80 casebooks.

Offline review boundary

Phase 80 creates deterministic local review collections only. It does not establish semantic findings, annotations with authority, collaboration/account authority, authorship, ownership, authenticity, origin, chronology, legal custody, authoritative-copy status, compatibility, restore priority, trusted time, remote trust, signature validity or production acceptance.

Input contract

Choose two valid Phase 80 casebooks. Comparison reports exact casebook/report-document identity differences only; side order is not chronology or authority.

Safe interpretation

A valid casebook proves deterministic local grouping and exact cryptographic binding to revalidated Phase 79 reports. Report ordering is cryptographic, not chronological, and aggregate counts may overlap across reports.

02 / Compatibility

Know the supported input before opening a file.

Compatibility fields are intentionally explicit. Missing values stay unclaimed rather than being filled with generic assumptions.

Accepted extensions

json

Platforms

No platform assignment is recorded.

Supported versions / editions

Phase 80 accepts 1-32 strictly valid Phase 79 offline audit reports. Each report is capped at 4 MiB and combined report input at 64 MiB. Pair workspaces require exactly two distinct reports; single-catalog workspaces require one exact Phase 78 source-catalog ID across all reports.

Input constraints

Choose two valid Phase 80 casebooks. Comparison reports exact casebook/report-document identity differences only; side order is not chronology or authority.

Known limitations

Phase 80 creates deterministic local review collections only. It does not establish semantic findings, annotations with authority, collaboration/account authority, authorship, ownership, authenticity, origin, chronology, legal custody, authoritative-copy status, compatibility, restore priority, trusted time, remote trust, signature validity or production acceptance.

Output / result

Deterministic canonical UTF-8 JSON offline review casebooks, reproducible Markdown, SHA-256-bound embedded report records/manifests/casebook identities, exact summaries, membership receipts and casebook comparison receipts.

03 / Instructions

Use a reversible workflow.

File-oriented workflows start with an untouched original. Tool-specific instructions add only details documented for this utility.

01Keep the original
Preserve an untouched copy before creating or transforming binary output.
02Confirm scope
Match the file size, format, platform, and version to the support information on this page.
03Process locally
Use the runtime only when the page reports that its declared engine is loaded.
04Validate output
Compare or test the result before replacing any working source file.

Tool-specific steps

Choose two Phase 80 casebooks, compare exact cryptographic report identities locally, and save the comparison receipt. Do not treat left/right order as time or authority.

04 / Privacy and processing

The processing mode is part of the product contract.

SaveEditor.com should state local processing only when the implementation truly keeps file contents in the browser. Server or hybrid processing must be disclosed just as clearly.

Declared mode

Browser local

Runtime state

Operational

Tool-specific privacy notes

All casebook construction, Phase 79 revalidation, membership checks, comparison, rebuild and rendering occur in browser memory. No upload, remote collaboration, account/cloud access, remote trust/search, trusted timestamp, signing/private-key operation, restore, source mutation or live-save write is performed.

05 / Troubleshooting

When a file is rejected, do not force it.

A rejection can indicate an unsupported size, format, version, platform, or byte sequence. Preserve the original and correct the input instead of bypassing validation.

Wrong file or size

Re-check the documented input type and browser size limit before retrying.

Unsupported format

A generic converter does not imply support for every game-specific container, signing scheme, or serialization format.

Source was modified

Return to the untouched source instead of repeatedly processing a damaged or partially transformed file.

Known Tool issues

A failed casebook check means the strict Phase 80 schema, Phase 79 report validation, report record digest, manifest, deterministic Markdown, canonical order, workspace constraint or casebook ID did not match. Do not infer chronology, semantics, authorship, ownership, authenticity, origin, legal custody, remote trust or production approval from PASS.

06 / Verification

Support claims should be traceable.

The verification date, method notes, and public references are kept separate from marketing language so compatibility can be reviewed over time.

Last verified2026-08-11

Profileoffline-casebook-comparison-receipt

Method notes

Verified with strict Phase 79 report revalidation, independent SHA-256/canonical-JSON references, deterministic ordering/rebuild vectors, duplicate-report refusal, single-catalog/pair constraint negatives, altered report/record/manifest/Markdown/casebook-ID negatives, source immutability, no-network/no-signing/no-collaboration guards and source/installable parity.

07 / FAQ

Questions to answer before editing.

These answers are generated from the Tool record and current runtime state rather than generic compatibility promises.

Is Offline Casebook Comparison Receipt ready to use?

The Tool record is verified and declares an operational runtime. The page enables its input controls only when the declared engine module is loaded in the current build.

Does processing stay in the browser?

Yes for this declared mode. The loaded runtime processes the explicit input in the browser; Tool-specific privacy notes describe the exact scope and limits.

Should I keep the original file?

Yes. Keep an untouched source file until any generated output has been validated.

What if my input is rejected?

Use the validation message to correct the base, encoding, width, timezone, byte alignment, or size. The runtime does not guess through invalid input.

Find a game, tool, or guide.

Matching favorites and recent

Favorites on this device